In the Age of AI: Transforming Forensic Science While Practitioners Remain Vigilant

Nick Olivier (Ed.) • 15 April 2026

Editorial: (Forensic Science)

"Artificial Intelligence in Forensic Science: Can It Be a Revolution or Else?"

The need to rely on facts and data rather than assumptions and indignation was emphasised in a recent LinkedIn article by Joha-Maine Andrianatos titled "In the Age of AI: What Fraud Examiners Can Learn" in the field of financial crime investigation. This made me consider the impact on practitioners' prejudices and the function of AI in criminal justice. In this age of instantaneous global information dissemination, how can one preserve a healthy dose of critical thinking?


I recalled an article titled "Artificial Intelligence in Forensic Science: Can It Be a Revolution or Else?" that highlights the growing influence of AI in the field of forensic science. It suggests that forensic science is entering an exciting phase, where new technologies, methods, and scientific breakthroughs are opening up possibilities that once seemed unimaginable. As technology continues to permeate everyday life, crime-solving is becoming increasingly advanced—almost futuristic in its capabilities.


Looking ahead, forensic work will likely be supported by AI, though not entirely driven by it, especially in the gathering and interpretation of evidence for law enforcement. This shift means that not only forensic scientists, but also practising experts, law enforcement personnel, and others involved in the justice system will need a basic understanding of AI, machine learning, and neural networks.


Read more in the source.


Source: Saba, N. & Balwan, W. K. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Forensic Science: Can It Be a Revolution or

Else? Scholars Academic Journal of Biosciences, 16(22), 9777. https://doi.org/10.36347/sajb.2025.v13i03.005


Image: OpenAI. (2026). In the age of AI: Transforming forensic science while practitioners remain vigilant [AI-generated image]. ChatGPT.

by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 17 June 2026
Editorial: (Anti Money Laundering) "Anti-Money Laundering and Customer Due Diligence: Empirical Evidence from South Africa." & "Grey-listing: South Africa’s Progress Plan Against its Action Plan." & "The Legal Implications of South Africa’s Grey-Listing for Money Laundering: Analysis and Recommendations ."
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 13 June 2026
Editorial: (Corporate Governance) "Introduction to Corporate Governance." & "The Concept of Corporate Governance."
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 5 June 2026
Editorial: (Compliance) "A framework to assess compliance training effectiveness: The case of banks in South Africa."
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 1 June 2026
Editorial: (Fraud Examination) "Gift or bribe? The characteristics and the role of gift policies in the prevention of corruption."
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 19 May 2026
Editorial: (Fraud Examination) "Fraud Is Not Just a Control Failure: Integrity Under Pressure."
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 17 May 2026
Editorial: (Fraud Examination) "Fathoming Fraud: Unveiling Theories, Investigating Pathways and Combating Fraud."
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 16 May 2026
Editorial: (Fraud Examination) "Forensic Accounting vs Fraud Examination: Roles, Importance and Differences."
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 9 May 2026
Editorial: (Compliance) "A Comparison of Key Risk Management Frameworks: COSO-ERM, NIST RMF, ISO 31.000, COBIT."
by Nick Oliver (Ed.) 3 May 2026
Editorial: (Digital Forensics) "Digital Forensics Has a Body of Knowledge Problem. This Taxonomy Is My Attempt to Fix It."
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 2 May 2026
Editorial: (Forensic Science) Comparing "Thompson et al. 2025" with "Morrison et al. 2025": The Question About the Best Way to Present Likelihood Ratios.