Fraud Is Not Just a Control Failure: Integrity Under Pressure

Nick Olivier (Ed.) • 17 May 2026

Editorial: (Fraud Examination)
"Fathoming Fraud: Unveiling Theories, Investigating Pathways and Combating Fraud."

In this editorial, I argue that fraud should not be understood merely as a failure of controls, procedures or oversight, but as a pressured ethical decision shaped by organisational conditions, personal integrity, opportunity, capability and culture.


Mandal and Amilan (2021) contrast established fraud theories, including the fraud triangle, fraud scale, fraud diamond, fraud pentagon, MICE, SCCORE, organisational fraud models, and the triangle of fraud action, to show that financially motivated crime emerges through a pathway in which vulnerability becomes action. Their analysis highlights integrity as a practical fraud-risk factor rather than a soft moral ideal, while also distinguishing between fraud prevention and fraud investigation. It argues that controls may reduce opportunity, but culture shapes rationalisation, capability enables execution, and disciplined evidence-based truth-finding is required when prevention fails.


The golden thread is not "control failure" but "choice under enabling conditions".


Fraud happens when a person under pressure encounters opportunity, possesses or obtains the means to act, finds a way to justify the conduct, and operates in an environment that fails to stop, expose or morally disrupt the decision. What connects the theories is the search for the fraud pathway. In contrast, what separates them is the location of blame: inside the person, inside the organisation, inside the opportunity structure, or inside the evidence trail.


The central conclusion is that fraud is not just a control failure; it is a breakdown in ethical choice under pressure, made possible by enabling environments and exposed only through rigorous investigation.


Read more in the source.


Source: 

Mandal, A., & Amilan, S. (2024). Fathoming fraud: unveiling theories, investigating pathways and combating fraud. Journal of Financial Crime, 31(5), 1106-1125. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-06-2023-0153


Image: OpenAI. (2026). Fraud Theories: The Golden Thread [AI-generated image]. ChatGPT.


Expanded Version: Read an expanded version of the Blog on LinkedIn.

by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 16 May 2026
Editorial: (Fraud Examination) "Forensic Accounting vs Fraud Examination: Roles, Importance and Differences."
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 9 May 2026
Editorial: (Compliance) "A Comparison of Key Risk Management Frameworks: COSO-ERM, NIST RMF, ISO 31.000, COBIT."
by Nick Oliver (Ed.) 3 May 2026
Editorial: (Digital Forensics) "Digital Forensics Has a Body of Knowledge Problem. This Taxonomy Is My Attempt to Fix It."
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 2 May 2026
Editorial: (Forensic Science) Comparing "Thompson et al. 2025" with "Morrison et al. 2025": The Question About the Best Way to Present Likelihood Ratios.
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 24 April 2026
Editorial: (Forensic Science) "The Identification, Processing and Investigation of Forensic Investigative Leads in the South African Police Service"
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 23 April 2026
Editorial: (Investigative Interviewing) "Culture, Trauma, and Memory in Investigative Interviews"
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 22 April 2026
Editorial: (Law & Justice) "International Co-Operation in Criminal Matters in South Africa: A Comprehensive Analysis of Mutual Legal Assistance and Extradition"
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 21 April 2026
Editorial: (Forensic Pathology) "Forensic Maceration – A Comparative Analysis of Literature and Practical Application"
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 17 April 2026
Editorial: (Forensic Science) "Towards More Relevance in Forensic Science Research and Development"
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 15 April 2026
Editorial: (Forensic Science) "Artificial Intelligence in Forensic Science: Can It Be a Revolution or Else?"