Forensic DNA: The Genetic Witness

Nick Olivier (Ed.) • 29 September 2025

Editorial: (Forensic Science)
"The Genetic Witness: Forensic DNA Phenotyping"

Before the advent of DNA testing, according to van Laan, forensic biological samples were processed primarily through serology techniques, such as ABO blood typing and polymorphic isoenzyme analysis, to narrow down potential donors. While these methods could help eliminate unlikely suspects, they could not pinpoint an individual. Research has shown that many convictions based on serology were later proven incorrect when DNA testing was applied, with FBI studies indicating that nearly one-third of serologically determined cases would be excluded by DNA. This high error rate, often due to exaggerated serological findings, led to wrongful convictions and increased calls for better testing methods.


DNA, a fundamental building block of life, became a cornerstone of forensic investigation after Sir Alec Jeffreys discovered its ability to individualise humans in 1984. Testing techniques have advanced since then, starting with Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP). Although RFLP provided valuable results, it required high-quality DNA and was time-consuming.


In the future, even small amounts of DNA could yield accurate photographic composites of suspects, enabling rapid, specific identification. Forensic DNA Phenotyping (FDP) of External Visual Characteristics (EVCs) could deter crime by increasing the likelihood of identification. Additionally, retrieving fingerprints from DNA samples could enable searches of databases such as the Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS).


Despite its promise, FDP technology is still developing and requires further validation for reliable use. Research is needed on environmental changes, mixed sample interpretations, and improving predictive accuracy. Regulations should guide the responsible use of FDP to mitigate risks of misuse. Ultimately, FDP must be employed to objectively seek the truth and ensure justice.


Read more from the source.


Source: Michele Van Laan (2017), The genetic witness: forensic DNA phenotyping. Journal of Emerging Forensic Science Research. Vol. 2 No. 2: 33-52. https://jefsr.uwindsor.ca/index.php/jefsr/article/view/5005


Image: By Jerome Walker - Own work, created from GDFL work created by Michael Ströck, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=934419


by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 17 June 2026
Editorial: (Anti Money Laundering) "Anti-Money Laundering and Customer Due Diligence: Empirical Evidence from South Africa." & "Grey-listing: South Africa’s Progress Plan Against its Action Plan." & "The Legal Implications of South Africa’s Grey-Listing for Money Laundering: Analysis and Recommendations ."
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 13 June 2026
Editorial: (Corporate Governance) "Introduction to Corporate Governance." & "The Concept of Corporate Governance."
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 5 June 2026
Editorial: (Compliance) "A framework to assess compliance training effectiveness: The case of banks in South Africa."
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 1 June 2026
Editorial: (Fraud Examination) "Gift or bribe? The characteristics and the role of gift policies in the prevention of corruption."
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 19 May 2026
Editorial: (Fraud Examination) "Fraud Is Not Just a Control Failure: Integrity Under Pressure."
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 17 May 2026
Editorial: (Fraud Examination) "Fathoming Fraud: Unveiling Theories, Investigating Pathways and Combating Fraud."
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 16 May 2026
Editorial: (Fraud Examination) "Forensic Accounting vs Fraud Examination: Roles, Importance and Differences."
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 9 May 2026
Editorial: (Compliance) "A Comparison of Key Risk Management Frameworks: COSO-ERM, NIST RMF, ISO 31.000, COBIT."
by Nick Oliver (Ed.) 3 May 2026
Editorial: (Digital Forensics) "Digital Forensics Has a Body of Knowledge Problem. This Taxonomy Is My Attempt to Fix It."
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 2 May 2026
Editorial: (Forensic Science) Comparing "Thompson et al. 2025" with "Morrison et al. 2025": The Question About the Best Way to Present Likelihood Ratios.