The genetic witness: forensic DNA phenotyping

Nick Olivier (Ed.) • 29 September 2025

Editorial:  The Genetic Witness: Forensic DNA Phenotyping

Before the advent of DNA testing, according to van Laan, forensic biological samples were processed primarily through serology techniques, such as ABO blood typing and polymorphic isoenzyme analysis, to narrow down potential donors. While these methods could help eliminate unlikely suspects, they could not pinpoint an individual. Research has shown that many convictions based on serology were later proven incorrect when DNA testing was applied, with FBI studies indicating that nearly one-third of serologically determined cases would be excluded by DNA. This high error rate, often due to exaggerated serological findings, led to wrongful convictions and increased calls for better testing methods.


DNA, a fundamental building block of life, became a cornerstone of forensic investigation after Sir Alec Jeffreys discovered its ability to individualise humans in 1984. Testing techniques have advanced since then, starting with Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP). Although RFLP provided valuable results, it required a significant amount of quality DNA and was time-consuming.


In the future, even tiny amounts of DNA could create accurate photographic composites of suspects, allowing for specific and rapid identification. Forensic DNA Phenotyping (FDP) of External Visual Characteristics (EVCs) could deter crime by increasing the likelihood of identification. Additionally, retrieving fingerprints from DNA samples could allow for searches in databases like the Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS).


Despite its promise, FDP technology is still developing and requires further validation for reliable use. Research is needed on environmental changes, mixed sample interpretations, and improving predictive accuracy. Regulations should guide the responsible use of FDP to mitigate risks of misuse. Ultimately, FDP must be employed to objectively seek the truth and ensure justice.


Read more from the source.


Source: Michele Van Laan (2017), The genetic witness: forensic DNA phenotyping. Journal of Emerging Forensic Science Research. Vol. 2 No. 2: 33-52. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14636778.2012.687132


Image: By Jerome Walker - Own work, created from GDFL work created by Michael Ströck, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=934419


by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 6 October 2025
Editorial: The Sydney declaration: Revisiting the Essence of Forensic Science through its Fundamental Principles
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 1 October 2025
Editorial: Forensic Training: Bridging the Gap between Education and the Workplace
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 1 October 2025
Editorial: Opening up Forensic DNA Phenotyping: The Logics of Accuracy, Commonality and Valuing
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 1 October 2025
Editorial: Digital Pathology and AI in Forensic Medicine: Advances, Limitations, and Medico-legal Utility
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 1 October 2025
Editorial: Overview of Fingerprint-Based  Blood-Grouping using Various Tools and Techniques
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 30 September 2025
Editorial: Spotlight Cybercrime Focus: Outsmarting Real-life Criminals in the Virtual World
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 30 September 2025
Editorial: The Evolution and Impact of Forensic Science: A Reflection on DNA Profiling
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 30 September 2025
Editorial: New Frontiers and Challenges of DNA Analysis in Criminal Investigations.
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 29 September 2025
Editorial: AI can simplify complexity in litigation support
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 29 September 2025
Editorial: Risky profiles: Societal dimensions of forensic uses of DNA profiling technologies