AI can simplify complexity in litigation support

Nick Olivier (Ed.) • 29 September 2025

Editorial: AI can simplify complexity in litigation support

Artificial intelligence (AI), according to Warne, Charron and Cornell, has the potential to improve litigation support by assisting accounting professionals in clarifying intricate accounting ideas and delivering persuasive evidence. Here’s a guide to understanding the technology’s limitations, legal considerations, and optimal practices for utilising AI to further justice.


Cases of financial fraud often involve complicated terminology and vast amounts of documents and data. These intricate details are clear to the accountants and financial professionals who dedicate extensive time—sometimes months or years—to analyse the data and trace the money back to the wrongdoers. However, imagine how a jury might perceive an alleged construction fraud case that includes several interconnected contracts—such as agreements between a contractor and a client, along with a different loan agreement with a bank—without the expertise required to understand it. To the jury, an accountant serving as an expert witness may as well be speaking in a foreign language. As fraud cases become more data-driven and convoluted, the role of financial analysts and litigation support specialists must adapt. In the courtroom, accountants have transitioned from mere number crunchers to storytellers, interpreters, and crucial contributors in the pursuit of justice.


When legal conflicts arise, it is the responsibility of accounting experts to analyse the figures, resolve discrepancies in interpretation, and present a coherent account of what transpired. In a construction fraud case, forensic accounting professionals called to testify must determine who made specific agreements by gathering an extensive paper trail that could encompass hundreds of pages, including contracts, loan agreements, requests for payments, inspector reports, and additional documentation. Their responsibilities also include reconstructing a detailed month-by-month account of the project’s progress in relation to financial records and contractual agreements. Conveying complex financial concepts in an understandable manner for a jury poses a challenge. In court, effective communication is just as essential as technical precision. Due to the magnitude of this task, many experts have started to utilise artificial intelligence (AI) tools to assist in transforming dense data into accessible, visually engaging narratives that can withstand legal examination.


AI is a revolutionary force for accounting professionals, particularly in litigation support. It turns complex data into compelling summaries, intuitive visuals, and clear reports, bridging the gap between expert accountants and lawmakers. To fully leverage AI, accounting experts must master prompt engineering and navigate its ethical and legal complexities. Implementing a strong data governance policy, providing thorough training, and establishing acceptable use guidelines are essential for responsible AI integration. Those who embrace AI as a strategic asset will enhance their practice and redefine their roles as influential communicators. By automating routine tasks, generative AI allows accountants to concentrate on higher-level functions like persuasive opinion development and courtroom strategy, positioning them as powerful advocates for truth and justice.


Read more from the source.


Source: Rick C. Warne, Kim Charron, Robert M. Cornell (2025), AI can simplify complexity in litigation support. Article in Fraud Magazine. https://www.acfe.com/fraud-magazine/all-issues/issue/article?s=2025-septoct-ai-for-enhancing-ligitation-support


Image: Fraud Magazine. https://www.acfe.com/fraud-magazine/all-issues/issue/article?s=2025-septoct-ai-for-enhancing-ligitation-support


by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 9 May 2026
Editorial: (Fraud Risk Management) "A Comparison of Key Risk Management Frameworks: COSO-ERM, NIST RMF, ISO 31.000, COBIT."
by Nick Oliver (Ed.) 3 May 2026
Editorial: (Digital Forensics) "Digital Forensics Has a Body of Knowledge Problem. This Taxonomy Is My Attempt to Fix It."
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 2 May 2026
Editorial: (Forensic Science) Comparing "Thompson et al. 2025" with "Morrison et al. 2025": The Question About the Best Way to Present Likelihood Ratios.
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 24 April 2026
Editorial: (Forensic Science) "The Identification, Processing and Investigation of Forensic Investigative Leads in the South African Police Service"
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 23 April 2026
Editorial: (Investigative Interviewing) "Culture, Trauma, and Memory in Investigative Interviews"
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 22 April 2026
Editorial: (Law & Justice) "International Co-Operation in Criminal Matters in South Africa: A Comprehensive Analysis of Mutual Legal Assistance and Extradition"
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 21 April 2026
Editorial: (Forensic Pathology) "Forensic Maceration – A Comparative Analysis of Literature and Practical Application"
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 17 April 2026
Editorial: (Forensic Science) "Towards More Relevance in Forensic Science Research and Development"
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 15 April 2026
Editorial: (Forensic Science) "Artificial Intelligence in Forensic Science: Can It Be a Revolution or Else?"
by Nick Olivier (Ed.) 14 April 2026
Editorial: (Policing) "Bridging Policing Practice and Academic Excellence for Sustainable Crime Prevention and Public Sector Reform"