Editorial: AI can simplify complexity in litigation support

Editorial: The Genetic Witness: Forensic DNA Phenotyping

Successful prosecution in the Durban Commercial Crimes Court for the HAWKS

Remain blind, lady justice.

So you think that you want to be a CSI? Take a look at what that means.

A claim of defamation

For every person the road to a career in forensics is unique. Some law enforcement officers’ love for forensics is born out of years on crime scenes. Others are born with a desire to have a career in this field and some simply stumble upon a forensics career because of their love for analysing data. For forensic technicians, it’s all about evidence collection. From reconstructing a crime scene to analysing phone records. For forensic scientists, this career stems from science. What is a forensic technician? Forensic technicians or criminalists are found both in the private sector and in law enforcement. This is a broad term that refers to a few different fields within forensics. These can be grouped under the following main categories: Forensic science: these individuals aspire to work in the Police Service's Criminal Record Centres or Forensic Science Services Division. This career path focuses specifically on the reconstruction of a crime scene, lab technicians who aspire to work with forensic biology or working to verify facts or documentation in a police investigation. Forensic biology: these technicians aim to work in either the private or public sector’s laboratories that take on forensic work. They can work either primarily with DNA, Chemistry or they can focus on forensic document examination. Both the lab technician or crime scene technicians collect crucial physical evidence to connect their findings to a victim and/or perpetrator. How to become a forensic technician in South Africa? Through Law Enforcement You can move into a career in forensics by joining the South African Police Service. Your years of experience with SAPS, combined with a forensic qualification can open the doors to become a forensic technician. To become a police officer in South Africa: 1. You can apply to SAPS either by means of becoming a police official through the South African Police Service Act or as a civilian employee. The primary difference between the civilian and the police official is that the latter works in the field rather than in administration. 2. In order to apply for either one of these positions you must pass a psychological assessment test and have at least matric (NSC). You will also need to pass a physical fitness test. 3. You can study to become a forensic technician prior or after you are employed by SAPS. Understand that terms and conditions regarding recruitment and careers applies Through a qualification: You can study to become a criminalist and then directly apply at the South African Police Service's Criminal Record Centres or Forensic Science Services Division. What to study towards forensics: 1. You will need to complete or have completed your matric with good grades in mathematics and science. 2. You can then study towards a qualification starting on NQF5, this is equivalent to a first year bachelors degree. For Forensic Science, you should have had Mathematics, Communication and Physical Science in matric. 3. Once you have completed the above, apply for the NQF 6 in Forensic Biology, you will be required to complete the Forensic Biology Elective of the NQF 5. Forensic technician salary in South Africa. Once you have completed the above mentioned steps for forensic technician in the field of forensic science you can expect an average yearly income of R127,793* depending on the years of experience that you have acquired and relevant Terms and Conditions of the potential employer. As a crime scene investigator with the above mentioned completed you can expect an average yearly income of R242,667*. As a DNA expert, with the above mentioned completed your average yearly income can be around R269,370*. The difference between a forensic technician and forensic scientist in South Africa. The primary difference between a forensic technician and scientist is the handling of evidence. Where the technician collects and documents evidence, or analysis documentation. The forensic scientist applies scientific methods (experiments) to build further on a case. This combination of science and forensics creates the forensic expert. These experts include medical examiners, pathologists and microbiologists, to name a few. Unlike the technician, the forensic scientist does not often go to a crime scene itself, but rather helps analyze collected evidence to individualize such evidence with the aim to connect it to a person. You can read more about the study path to become a forensic scientist in our previous article here . Forensic scientist salary in South Africa Forensic investigator salary in South Africa ranges around R307,075* per year. Pathologist and medical examiners can earn over a million rand per year*. Forensic analysts: can earn around the R282,299* mark yearly depending on their experience level. We are seeing more and more forensic disciplines emerging, which means that job opportunities in this field are expanding. Thanks to the technologically advanced times we live in today, we are seeing better data and analysis filtering into forensic fields. It’s an exciting time to explore a career in forensics! Explore our qualifications to help you towards a career in this field. Resources: South Africa Police Recruitment - www.how2become.com Forensic salaries South Africa - www.salaryexpert.com Paycale - Payscale.com/research/ZA/Skill=Forensics/Salary Career Opportunities in Forensic Science - By Susan Echaore-McDavid, Richard A. McDavid: ISBN-13: 978-0-8160-6156-3 * Salaries referenced to in this article are indicative only and subject to change

The world has never been as connected as it is in the modern-day. Everything we do is online and therefore trackable. Thanks to this technology, alleged corruption like that of Jacob Zuma, VBS bank and the EFF could be exposed in the finest detail. In this article, we look at the lead up to how South African citizens were defrauded out of around 2 billion rand. This includes a capture of the case’s current status and insight on the fraud examination process. Background In 1982, the Venda Building Society (VBS) bank was established by the Venda Homeland Government. Initially the bank was a small financial institution without the bells and whistles of a national bank like FNB, ABSA and Standard Bank. VBS’ main priority was to help communities to invest through the Mutual Banks Act of 1993. The Mutual Banks Act of 1993 requires that Mutual Banks be regulated by the Reserve Bank. Within their management system, depositors become shareholders with voting rights. This exact structure led to the initial doubts around VBS bank. In 2016 the bank granted Jacob Zuma a loan of around R7 million to pay back his debt for the upgrades on his Nkandla home. During this same period, Zuma became one of the bank’s major shareholders. This changed the small regional bank to a national bank overnight. Shortly after this, ANC-controlled councils in Limpopo and one in Gauteng started depositing money into VBS bank. These funds were then redirected to bank executives like Mphephu Ramabulana, politicians and 52 other implicated individuals . In 2018 the bank collapsed, unable to pay its customers. What’s Happening Now? At the beginning of this article, we mentioned the power of technology in the modern world. It is thanks to contemporary connectivity and crafty fraud-examination techniques that the movement of funds and those who authorised them could be investigated. In the recently released report by advocate Terry Motau and law firm Werksmans, two key factors were brought to light. It is now evident how the finance officials at councils were stopped from asking questions regarding the transfer of funds to VBS bank. Included was how these funds were distributed and finally channelled to Julius Malema and deputy EFF president Floyd Shivambu. The report also revealed how these two spent the money on personal luxuries . The chairperson of VBS and Vele Investments, Tshifhiwa Matodzi, was first arrest on the 17th of June 2020. Matodzi was charged for manipulating the bank’s financials to hide its true state. Followed were 8 others who were charged with money laundering, theft, corruption and fraud . What is the fraud examination process? Our Certified Fraud Examiner, Nick Olivier, explained that in essence, the standard fraud investigation procedure would include receiving the complaint and conducting a preliminary investigation to determine if there was merit to inspect any further. If additional investigation is warranted, a file is opened, and the investigation is planned with both witnesses and victims being interviewed. Running parallel to this is the identification, preservation, collection and examination of evidence in order to prove that elements of the crime are under investigation. It is either at this point or possibly at an earlier stage that identified suspects are interviewed. Depending on the mandate or scope of the investigation, a criminal case should be registered with the South African Police Service. The opening of a criminal case does not prevent a victim from initiating a civil case against the perpetrators who caused a loss, in order to recover the ill-gotten gains. Sources https://www.news24.com/citypress/News/what-is-vbs-mutual-bank-everything-you-need-to-know-2 0160922 https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2020-06-18-vbs-bank-heist-arrests-whos-next/#gsc.tab=0 https://www.timeslive.co.za/sunday-times/business/2018-10-10-venda-king-drawn-into-vbs-mutualbank- drama/ https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2018-10-10-r2bn-looted-from-corrupt-rotten-vbs-bank-saysreport/ https://ewn.co.za/2020/06/17/from-bank-heist-to-arrests-a-timeline-of-the-vbs-scandal

One of the most exciting things about forensic science is its ability to reveal the untold truth. Like the saying goes; there is your version, my version and then there is the [scientifically proven version]. Nick Olivier, Pretoria based Forensic Investigator highlights this in the use of forensic science in South African courts. The more questions the court has about the true events of a case, the more value it places on forensic evidence. In our previous post , we discussed the importance of evidence in a crime. Now we will highlight these subjects using a real case scenario, And show you, as Nick mentioned, how forensic science can play a vital role in the outcome of a case. The Van Breda-Murder case Overview: In January 2015 emergency response received a call from Henri Van Breda. He requested for medical assistance and informed the operator that his family had been attacked by an intruder with an axe. His father Martin van Breda was the managing director of Engel & Völkers in Australia. Martin’s impressive businessmen ship, including ventures like Netstar, had provided a prosperous and comfortable lifestyle for the family. At the time of the murder, the family resided in the prestigious De Zalze Wineland Estate. Of the 5 family members both parents, Martin and Teresa were killed along with their eldest son Rudi. The Breda’s daughter and youngest, Marli survived but was severely injured during the attack. She later made a full recovery. Henri ‘escaped’ with minor injuries. The Trial: The case took a whopping 9 months from the time of arrest and first court appearance to the trail in the Western Cape High court. None the less the prosecution was skeptical from the onset about Henri’s version of events. From his minor injuries to the crime scene, investigators found too many inconsistencies with what Henri had reported and what the forensic evidence revealed. The case was made that Henri himself had killed both his parents and brother with an axe before attempting to murder his sister Marli. What Forensic Evidence Reveal About The Case: The primary evidence used to build the case aimed to answer the question of whether Henri had indeed killed his family or was it an intruder as he claimed? This was achieved by analysing his behaviour before and during the night of the murder. Gathering evidence to establish Henri’s position within the family. Collecting forensic evidence from the crime scene and compiling a plausible motive for Henri to have killed his family. Early on in the case, investigators established that Henri had a drug problem. They interviewed his potential dealer and also found records where he was institutionalised in 2014. This was significant because of the correlation between drug and alcohol abuse and violent crimes. Crime Scene Evidence: Sergeant Marlon Appollis and his team found that there was no forced entry into the Breda’s home the night of the attack. The Breda’s property was also in a 24-hours monitored security estate. To further strengthen this, investigators also noticed from the onset that valuables like electronic devices were not taken. During the trial, the state revealed that there was evidence that Henri had tampered with the crime scene. His cellphone records showed that he had made an unsuccessful call to his girlfriend at 04:00. Shortly after he searched for emergency services. Two hours elapsed before the call was made. This arose suspicion, why had it taken so long to call for help. Although Henri had said that he had fainted after the attack. The state had evidence that proved that he tampered with the evidence in this time instead along with inflicting wounds on himself to mislead police to believe he had been in an altercation. Further, the wounds were made with a knife rather than with an axe, which was the primary weapon used on all of his family members. Blood Spatter Analysis and Autopsy: Police captain Marius Joubert who analysed the blood spatters concluded that the crime scene had been tampered with and was inconsistent with his statement. According to Henri, he was hiding in the bathroom when his brother Rudi was attached. But after analysing the blood spatter on his shorts and socks. The case was made that he had been “in close proximity to the source of blood when force was applied”. Nick adds that the place where the axe was found after the attack, where the victims are lying and how the blood splatter spread can reveal the position of the attacker when the murders took place. "You can, for example, derive where the attacker was if the victims were lying down or were on their knees when they were attacked, whether or not there was a long struggle before they were killed, how long it took to kill the victim and how tall or strong the attacker is." The autopsy report by Dr Daphne Anthony showed that Martin was taken by surprise as he had no wounds relating to defense and also had a blow to the back. Again, this was inconsistent with Henri’s statement that his father had attacked the “masked intruder” while he was paralyzed in the bathroom. DNA (DeoxyriboNucleic Acid): Lieutenant-Colonel Sharlene Otto the chief DNA analyst for SAPS tested 216 samples collected from the crime scene. From there she could identify Martin and Teresa’s DNA from scrapings taken from underneath Henri’s nails. Importantly the state analysis also found no unknown DNA at the crime scene. This along with the lack of empathy sown by Henri during the emergency call and during the trial itself finally debunking the intruder claims in Henri testimony. On May 21, 2018, the evidence against Henri Van Breda was overwhelming and Judge Siraj Desai had no reason to doubt the state’s findings. Henri was charged with 3 counts of murder, one of attempted murder and obstruction of justice for lying to the police. Resources: 1. News 24 - van-breda-tampered-with-crime-scene-state-alleges-in-indictment 2. CTV News - south-african-man-23-found-guilty-of-axe-murders-of-family 3. IOL- five-things-to-know-about-the-henri-van-breda-axe-murder-case-24987359